HON 205: HONORS
HUMANITIES I (3
credits) Kopacz and Newhart
SYLLABUS
Spring 2005
TR 9:30,11:00 Case 162
Purpose
The central goal in this course is to explore some issues
that confront anyone who thinks seriously about how to lead his or her
life. We will try to meet this goal by
studying some great works from philosophy and literature and by engaging in
careful thought, discussion and writing. In order to achieve this goal
effectively, we will be trying to promote the development of several skills,
(1) some having to do with the reading of philosophic and literary texts, (2)
some with the practices of effective thinking and writing, and (3) some with
working effectively with other people.
To help with (1) and (2), we will engage in various sorts
of classroom activities, group discussions, lectures, etc. The first goal of these activities will be
to enhance our ability to use the various resources in the course (the texts we
read, the instructors’ and students’ ideas)
to help us to think deeply and carefully about how we decide to live our
lives. A second goal will be to
improve our skills at monitoring and correcting our own practices of
thinking. These practices will include
both cognitive abilities and non-cognitive abilities as we learn to notice how
both logic and emotions (for better or worse) play important roles in our
reflection on how we are to live.
The instructors in this course do not have very many
plans for you. We do hope that you will
not leave this course believing that the only purpose of education is for you
to learn to express the views of your teachers. (This would be particularly hard in this course since it is not
true that your teachers agree about all intellectual matters.) We also hope that you will not leave here
believing that all views about how humans should live their lives are equally
reasonable and worthy of approval. We
do hope that you will develop habits and skills that will help you examine your
own value-judgments more deeply and that you will gain some practice at using
these habits and skills to help others think well about their
value-judgments. We hope that in this
class a spirit of helping each other to think about the issues under discussion
will emerge. For in these difficult and
important matters we all need all the help we can get.
Disabilities Statement
If you are registered with
the Office of Services for Individuals with Disabilities, please make an
appointment with the course instructors to discuss any academic accommodations
you need. If you need academic accommodations and are not registered with the
Office of Services for Individuals with Disabilities, please contact the Office
directly either in person on the first floor of Turley House or by telephone at
(859)622-1500 V/TTY. Upon individual request, this syllabus can be made
available in alternative forms.
Required Texts
Michael L.
Morgan, Classics of Moral and Political Theory, third edition
(Hackett Publishing, 2001).
Betty Radice, trans. and ed.,
The Letters of Abelard and Heloise, (Penguin Books).
Shakespeare, King Lear,
(Signet Classics, New American Library, 1982).
Sophocles, The Complete
Plays, R.C. Jebb, translator, (Bantam Books, 1982).
These books are
available in paperback at the university bookstore.
Attendance
You are expected to attend all classes. If you miss
any classes for whatever reason, you are still responsible for anything said or
done in class during your absence.
Access to your Instructors
Kopacz’s office hours are: MF 10:00-11:00; TR
8:00-9:30
Office: Case Annex 390. Office phone: 622‑3088
E-mail: paula.kopacz@eku.edu
Newhart’s office hours are: MWF 12:20-1:10; TH
12:30-1:45
Office: Case Annex 257. Office phone: 622-2574
E-Mail: laura.newhart@eku.edu
Neither instructor wishes to restrict your access to
him or her to formal office hours. You
should feel free to ask for appointments at other times and to visit them in
their offices whenever they happen to be there.
Grading
There will be three in-class exams. The final exam will have two parts. The first part will be over material from
the last unit of the course; the second part will be a traditional final exam
type question dealing with various ideas discussed throughout the semester.
You will also be asked to write a paper on issues
related to the first unit of the course (Ancient Greece). The paper should be a
5-6 page (1200-1400 word) essay on a topic either selected from the list we
provide or devised by yourself and approved by your instructors. The whole paper process will involve 150
points. 40 of these points will be
awarded for “good faith” efforts in producing your proposal and rough drafts
and discussing them with an instructor.
Another 10 points will be awarded for the way your essay improves from
the rough draft to the final draft in response to the suggestions made by that
same instructor.
You will also be asked to participate with two or
three other students in a group presentation. You will choose a presentation
topic from a list provided or may generate your own with professors’ approval.
The topic must deal with some issue related to the Middle Ages or Renaissance.
Finally, there will be 10 required 1-2 page reading
responses each worth at most 5 points. All of these assignments will be related
to the assigned readings. Each of these assignments will have the following
values in determining your final grade:
|
Assignment |
Value for each item of this type |
Total points from this type |
|
In-class exams |
100 |
300 |
|
Final Exam |
200 |
200 |
|
Paper |
150 |
150 |
|
Reading Response Papers |
5 |
50 |
|
Group Presentation |
100 |
100 |
You may also earn a maximum of 20 extra credit points
by completing additional Reading Response Papers of your choice. Each of these
will be worth at most 5 points. These will be added to your point total as
extra credit points.
Your final grade will be determined on the following
scale: 720-800 = A, 640-719 = B, 560-639 = C, 480-559 = D, 0-479 = F.
The first in-class exam will be graded and returned
before mid-term.
List of Tentative Due Dates for Readings, Exams, and
Papers
(CMPT = Classics of Moral and Political Theory. HO = Handout)
|
Date |
Reading
Assignment |
Exams and Papers |
|
January 11 |
Introduction to course and each other |
|
|
January 13 |
Sophocles, Oedipus the King |
|
|
January 18 |
Sophocles, Oedipus the King |
|
|
January 20 |
Sophocles, Oedipus the King |
|
|
January 25 |
Aristotle, CMPT, 195-205 |
|
|
January 27 |
Aristotle, CMPT, 205-224 |
|
|
February 1 |
Aristotle, CMPT, 224-235 |
|
|
February 3 |
|
Exam 1 |
|
February 8 |
Plato, CMPT, 5-17 |
|
|
February 10 |
Plato, CMPT, 18-27 |
Paper proposal due |
|
February 15 |
Plato, CMPT, 18-27 cont. |
|
|
February 17 |
Sophocles, Antigone |
|
|
February 22 |
Sophocles, Antigone |
|
|
February 24 |
|
Exam 2 |
|
March 1 |
Early Islam: Al Farabi (HO) |
Paper rough draft due |
|
March 3 |
Early Islam: Al Gazali (HO) |
|
|
March 15 |
Early Islam: Rumi (HO) |
|
|
March 17 |
Abelard (HO) |
|
|
March 22 |
Heloise & Abelard |
|
|
March 24 |
Heloise & Abelard |
Paper final draft due |
|
March 29 |
|
Exam 3 |
|
March 31 |
Hobbes, CMPT, 531-538 |
|
|
April 5 |
Hobbes, CMPT, 538-544 |
|
|
April 7 |
Finish Hobbes, begin King Lear |
|
|
April 12 |
King Lear |
|
|
April 14 |
King Lear |
|
|
April 19 |
King Lear |
|
|
April 21 |
Group Presentations |
|
|
April 26 |
Group Presentations |
|
|
April 28 |
General Review |
|
|
May 3 (9:30 class) 8:00 a.m. |
|
Final Exam |
|
May 5 (11:00 class) 10:30 a.m. |
|
Final Exam |