Wendell Stephenson, St. Francis and Alcibiades: A Defense of Resentment
Philosophia, Vol.27, 1-2, March 1999

For very short answers:

1) What, according to Stephenson, is resentment?
2) What is the aim of his article?

For a longer answer:                             Example of 3)

3) Outline Stephenson’s reasoning that leads to his conclusion so that each significant step in his
reasoning is made clear.  Each point in your outline should be a complete sentence, and the last
point should be an accurate statement of his conclusion.  It should look more or less like this:

1. Premise: [blah, blah]
2. Premise: [whatever]
3. Therefore [so-and-so].  (This would be an intermediate conclusion based on previous premises)
4. Premise: [thus-and-such]
5. Premise: [la-te-dah]
6. Final Conclusion: [ . . . ]  (Based on the intermediate conclusion and the additional premises)

How many premises there are, whether there are intermediate conclusions, will depend on your
judgment and reading of the article.