Daniel Heybron, Evil Characters.  American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol.36, No.2, April 1999.

1)  Why does Heybron reject the view that being an evil person consists in being guilty of the gravest offences?

2)  Explain the differences between antisympathy, malice, and malevolence.  Include an example of your own (not from Heybron) of a person who exemplifies each.

3)  Explain what the opposite of each of antisympathy, malice, and malevolence would be.

4)  Sketch the differences Heybron sees between a deeply corrupt person and a purely evil person; and the differences in the appropriate ways to judge, evaluate, or blame these two kinds of people.